Teaching SL in one year

It should be said right at the start that the IB does not encourage that psychology SL be done in one year. There is a clear benefit to students having the full two years in order to develop their thinking as a psychologist in order to master the big ideas that make up the course.

That being said, however, there is a striking number of schools in which SL is taught in only one year. This is problematic in that it is difficult to cover all of the material in one year - and complete the internal assessment.

The most important decision to be made by the SL teacher who is required to teach the course in one year, is which option to teach. The choice of the option will then dictate how the rest of the course is taught. The three levels of analysis should be taught making the most of research that comes from the option. For example, if you choose Abnormal psychology as your option, then I would recommend the following schedule:

  • Introduction to research (2 weeks)
  • The biological level of analysis: in this unit, research regarding neurotransmission, genetics, and evolution can all be focused on the nature of depression. (10 weeks)
  • The cognitive level of analysis: once again, research here can be focused on depression - for example, the relationship between memory and emotion. (8 weeks)
  • Internal Assessment (3 weeks) The experiments should focus on a cognitive psychology topic - taking advantage of the unit that has just been completed. This should be done in class, and there should be clear deadlines with the focus on completing a rough draft in 3 weeks. A final draft after teacher comments should be due before the March deadline for submission to the IB.
  • Socio-cultural level of analysis: once again, this can focus a lot on depression. In particular, attribution theory, cultural dimensions and conformity are all issues that can easily be linked to abnormal behaviour. (8 weeks)
  • Abnormal psychology (8 weeks). By this point in the course you should have covered most of the learning objectives for depression. You may still have to address treatments. You will need to teach an anxiety disorder - but you do not need to teach treatment of this disorder. You will also need to discuss the nature of abnormal behaviour.

This is just one potential model. The way in which the curriculum was designed was such that the Paper I learning outcomes should set a foundation for the teaching of the options. That being the case, any one of the options has material that could be taught in order to teach the levels of analysis. Some teachers have tried to teach the option first and then cover the levels of analysis, but this technique may actually lead to more redundancy in the teaching of the material.

All materials on this website are for the exclusive use of teachers and students at subscribing schools for the period of their subscription. Any unauthorised copying or posting of materials on other websites is an infringement of our copyright and could result in your account being blocked and legal action being taken against you.

Comments 2

Kristin Johnson 27 November 2016 - 21:17

This outline is what I use to teach my SL course. This year for the first time we are offering HL to students who already tested last year in SL. I will have them for 2/3 of the year. I'm at a loss of how to go about the outline for this. Should I start with research methods more in depth than what I taught them for SL(Paper 3 info)? Then move into a review of the 3 core areas, IA and finally 2nd option area? Any other ideas would be greatly appreciated!

John Crane 28 November 2016 - 07:37

I would probably begin with research methods and then go into your final option. You may want to divide up your option - starting it, then doing your IA, then completing it. Then ending with review. Just a suggestion, but you will have a lot of time to complete that final option.

To post comments you need to log in. If it is your first time you will need to subscribe.