### Recent postsView all

 Sales of Zantac® sus…29 Sep 19 The danger of prolonged use of p…5 Jul 19 104Ku - an anachronis…26 Jun 19 Reducing global warming by incre…28 May 19 Free IB-approved online EE writi…2 May 19 Why you should recycle your old …18 Mar 19 Should chlorine be in group 31?28 Feb 19 Some basic household chemistry22 Feb 19 Today’s Google doodle8 Feb 19 An 1885 version of Mendeleev’s…20 Jan 19 Publishing your students’ rese…8 Jan 19 Making the site more student-fri…26 Nov 18

# Significant digits in context

Sunday 24 April 2016

A teacher has asked about a possible problem following an IB question that appeared on a past paper where a volume of 500 cm3 is quoted. The question asked by the teacher is; “Does a volume of 500 cm3 imply three significant digits (or figures) or just one significant digit when given in an IB question?”

The easy way the IB could avoid this problem is to use scientific notation, i.e. quote the volume as either 5 x 102 cm3 or 5.00 x 102 cm3 then it is clearly being quoted to one or three significant digits respectively.

However what is a student supposed to do if the IB writes 500 cm3 in a question?  This is a pertinent question to ask because it can affect how many significant digits should be given in the answer. If just mathematics is used to argue the case then the answer is clear. 500 is one significant digit. For example, an exact volume of 474 cm3 would be quoted as 500 cm3 to one significant digit.

The problem as I see it is that the mathematics should not be divorced from the chemistry and the answer actually depends upon how the volume was arrived at in the first place. If some solid was dissolved in water, the resulting solution transferred to a 500 cm3 volumetric flask and the total volume made up the mark on the flask, then to me the volume of 500 cm3 should be taken as being to three significant digits since a volumetric flask is that accurate. On the other hand, if a 600 cm3 beaker was used and the volume of 500 cm3 achieved by making up to the 500 cm3 mark on the beaker, then the 500 cm3 would only probably be accurate to one significant digit.

What I hope this illustrates is that we should be training students to look critically at all the information given not just follow one particular line of reasoning without question. In fact all this emphasis that some teachers put on significant figures is somewhat redundant when it comes to the external assessment. For the past few years, unless specifically asked to give the correct number of significant digits, students have not been penalized in exams if they quote their answers to the wrong number of significant digits.